Legal Opinion
County of Ramsey v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 16, 1984No. C4-82-1401, C4-82-1432, C6-82-1433, C8-82-1434, CX-82-1435, C5-82-1441, C7-82-1442, C9-82-1443, CX-82-1466, C1-82-1467 and C4-82-1480PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission issued orders in this telephone rate proceeding, and those dissatisfied with the orders then perfected appeals and notices of appearance in those appeals to the Ramsey County District Court under Minn.Stat. § 237.25 (1980). The district court dismissed the appeals and appearances with prejudice on the grounds that judicial review should have been sought under the appeal procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn.Stat. ch. 14 (1982). We reverse, holding that judicial review in telephone rate cases may be under either…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minneapolis Van & Warehouse Co. v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Stebbins v. Friend, Crosby & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate CommitteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kinkaid v. Board of Review of the City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Curtis v. Otter Tail County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. Scientific Computers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.