Legal Opinion

In re Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1991No. 90-1311PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

In an appeal from an administrative agency, a reviewing court is bound to uphold the agency’s order if it is “* * * supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law. * * *” R.C. 119.12; see, also, Univ. of Cincinnati v. Conrad (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 108, 17 O.O. 3d 65, 407 N.E. 2d 1265. In the instant case, we must determine if the common pleas court erred by finding that the board’s order was not supported by sufficient evidence. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that it did not and *87affirm the judgment of the court below.

In its arguments to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Arlen v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Washington County Home v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API