Legal Opinion

Rieder v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1974No. Appeal, No. 105 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

The Bureau of Employment Security, the referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review have all declared that appellant-claimant is disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits by reason of Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, 2nd. Ex. Sess., P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e), i.e., wilful misconduct.

The facts are not in dispute. Appellant-claimant had worked for her last employer for approximately two years. Her task was to inspect trousers for defects. On a number of occasions she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Wm. M. McClain, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Starkey v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
  3. Fidelity Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Martin v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wardlow v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API