Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Hayes
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DEL SOLE, P.J.:
¶ 1 We are presented with three consolidated appeals taken from trial court orders which required the production of certain discovery materials over challenges based on claims of privilege. We quash all three appeals.
¶ 2 The underlying action was instituted by Appellee, Patricia Harrison, who claimed she had suffered damages as a result of medical malpractice arising from her care and treatment at Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital, following a sledding accident. Harrison named Drs. Timothy J. Hayes and Margaret E. Marcinik as defendants, along with Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gocial v. Independence Blue CrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Jacksonian v. Temple University Health System FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Knopick, N. v. Boyle, D. and Boyle LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Castellani v. Scranton Times, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Castellani v. Scranton Times, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Reginelli, E. v. Boggs, M. Appeal of: MonongahelaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015