Pate v. State

Darrell Wayne Pate appeals the trial court's order revoking his probation.

Pate raises only one issue on appeal: he argues that the trial court's written revocation order was deficient under Armstrongv. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), and Wyatt v.State, 608 So.2d 762 (Ala. 1992), because, he says, the court failed to state the reasons for revoking his probation and the evidence it relied on in doing so.

"`In accordance with Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 [93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656] . . . (1973), Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), and Wyatt v. State, 608…