Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1992No. 1911040PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision,608 So.2d 761, in this case on the grounds that that decision conflicts with other decisions of that court. Specifically, the State argues that remand to the trial court for a written order was not necessary to meet the requirements of due process as set forth in Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100,312 So.2d 620 (1975). The State's petition, however, is premature in that the Court of Criminal Appeals has yet to issue a final judgment; therefore, we are compelled to dismiss the petition.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Salter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ex Parte LawrimoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Hairgrove v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  4. Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API