Edwards v. State

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the appellant did not preserve his claims that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance and that the State did not present sufficient evidence to support the revocation of his probation. I also concur with *1267the majority’s conclusion that the circuit court adequately set forth the evidence upon which it relied in revoking the appellant’s probation in this case. However, I disagree with the majority’s decision to overrule our previous decision in Phillips v. State, 10 So.3d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App.2008).

In its written revocation order in this case, the…