Legal Opinion

Department of Taxation v. Berry

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

This appeal presents a very narrow question. It is sought by the Department of Taxation to collect a tax imposed by sec. 72.75, Stats., the tax on transfer by gift.

In determining the issue we must observe the rule, “universal in its application, that a tax cannot be imposed without clear and express language for that purpose.” Wadhams Oil Co. v. State, 210 Wis. 448, 459, 245 N. W. 646, 246 N. W. 687.

If the deposits or any part thereof made by Earl E. Berry to the credit of himself and his wife were or can be considered to have been gifts to his wife they are taxable as such.

A transfer is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wadhams Oil Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Zahn v. GenrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Darling v. Mattoon State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ingram v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zander v. HollyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Estates of BeisbierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  4. First National Bank v. EckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Estate of Simonson v. HobbsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API