Estate of Simonson v. Hobbs
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The parties evidently agree that any differences between the bank accounts and bonds are immaterial upon this appeal and that they were alike in that, while decedent and his wife were living, either had power, without the consent of the other, to withdraw the deposits, or collect the bonds, and that after the death of either the survivor could do so.
Respondents, the administrators and the widow, contend that the inheritance tax to be imposed with respect to the property involved on this appeal is to be determined solely by applying sec. 72.01 (6), Stats., entitled “Joint Interests,” and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Estate of GurnseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In re the Appraisal of the Estate of TilleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of TilleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Kelberger v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Zander v. HollyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Kersten v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- First National Bank v. EckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962