Legal Opinion

Zahn v. Genrich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Appellant contends that the instrument in question is an attempt at testamentary disposition, not in conformity with the statutes and therefore void. It is also contended that it is not a gift because there was no delivery either of the money or of the original document itself, which the testimony shows remained in the custody of Mr. Gen-rich ; that it is not a valid assignment because control over the property assigned was retained by Johanna Sense; and that it is not effective as an acknowledgment of indebtedness because there was no indebtedness to acknowledge, and that it was consequently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warsco v. Oshkosh Savings & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pirie v. Le SaulnierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Schultz v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Estate of TollefsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Estate of SalzwedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stallman v. GosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Department of Taxation v. BerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ulsh v. WieslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Waukesha State Bank v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Krueger v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API