Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beard, Collector v. Vinsonhaler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1949No. 4-8881Published

1DissentHolt, J.

I respectfully dissent.

The City Ordinance involved here contains nine sections and provides, in effect: (1) The business of (a) generating electro-magnetic waves for radio broadcasting-purposes and/or (b) the business of intrastate radio broadcasting in Little Rock is a privilege and every person, etc., engaged therein shall pay to the City Collector an annual license fee of $250 beginning on or before April 30,1948;(2) That the business of soliciting intrastate radio advertising in Little Rock is a privilege and every person, etc., engaged therein shall pay to the City Collector an annual…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. McFeely v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Blumenstock Bros. Advertising Agency v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API