Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. K. L. R.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 2010No. 090415J Petition Number 090415J01 A143609PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

In this juvenile dependency case, mother appeals from a dispositional order that included a requirement that she and father each complete a polygraph test. The juvenile court imposed that requirement in order to determine whether mother or father caused unexplained injuries to their three-month-old child or knew the source of those injuries. Mother renews on appeal her assertion before the juvenile court that the polygraph requirement violated her rights against self-incrimination. We reverse and remand.

Mother and father stipulated to juvenile dependency jurisdiction in this case, which,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Redwine v. STARBOARD, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Department of Human Services v. T. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Courter v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. In the Interest D.L.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Donald B. v. Nev. Dep't of Family Servs. (In re S.L.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API