Legal Opinion

Munroe v. Harriman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 11, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

That Joseph W. Harriman, who, at the time of the inception of the transaction here in controversy, was president of Harriman National Bank & Trust Company, was thoroughly dishonest, and a cheat of the first magnitude, admits of no doubt. In the later days of his power he became desperate, and engaged in a series of frauds so reckless and unconscionable as to beggar description and approach unbelief. Inevitably, the crash came, and the wreckage was widespread. The bank failed. Its stockholders were subjected to assessments, its depositors have received but a part of their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Curtis, Collins & Holbrook Co. v. United States, and Twenty-Three Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Marr v. TumultyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Anderson v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  5. Wasmann v. City Nat. Bank of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willcox v. GoessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. Willcox v. GoessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API