Legal Opinion

Verrastro v. Grecco

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. File 66PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The defendants object to the requests contained in plaintiffs’ motion for disclosure for written statements of witnesses and also written statements of the defendants themselves, with the right to inspect or copy them. As to this, without further discussion, the court agrees with the objection of the defendants.

The defendants further object to the requests in plaintiffs’ motion which in substance seek to have the defendants disclose if they have liability insurance and, if so, the amount thereof and a copy of the policies. Counsel for the parties have argued this latter issue at some length…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Terry v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Maddox v. GraumanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Orgel v. McCurdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Brackett v. Woodall Food Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance Company v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Johanek v. AberleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1961
  3. Carman v. FishelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Langlois v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API