Legal Opinion

Guerrero v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2012No. S-10-0263PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Francis Xavier Guerrero, challenges his conviction of felony lareeny in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-402(a). He claims the district court erroneously instructed the jury on the elements of larceny. He also contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviec tion. We conclude the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and, accordingly, reverse.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Appellant raises the following issues:

1. Was the jury properly instructed on the elements of felony larceny?

2. Was there sufficient evidence to support the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Murdock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Joseph Gale MayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Wells v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Lance David Bean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Foltz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Shaun Thomas Kobielusz v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API