McConnell v. . Jones
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
Some controversy having arisen between plaintiff and defendant as to tbe balance due on a quantity of bay purchased from tbe defendant, tbe plaintiff adopted tbe procedure of instituting an action to determine tbe amount be owed. However, tbe defendant having answered and set up tbe amount be claimed was due, questions as to tbe form and sufficiency of tbe complaint are not presented.
Tbe plaintiff bottomed bis action on breach of implied warranty in tbe sale of tbe bay, in tbat a portion of it was unfit for tbe use for wbicb it was intended. He offered evidence tending to sbow tbat xnucb of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Ashford v. H. C. Shrader Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Hall Furniture Co. v. Crane Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Williams v. Dixie Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hendrix v. B & L Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Draughon v. MaddoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953