Legal Opinion
Brang Co. v. State University Construction Fund
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
Plaintiff was the low bidder on a tree planting project at the State University College of Forestry at Syracuse and executed a contract with the defendant State University Construction Fund for the performance of the required work. Among other items, the contract provided that the wages to be paid by plaintiff ‘ ‘ shall be not less than the prevailing rate of *179wages as defined by law.” Such rates are fixed in accordance with a procedure set forth in article 8 of the Labor Law which also mandates inclusion of the foregoing clause in contracts of this nature (Labor Law, § 220). Plaintiff entered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Building Chemicals Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1937
- D. M. W. Contracting Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- D. M. W. Contracting Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- E. Williamson Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Town of ParishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Tenalp Construction Corp. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- General Electric Co. v. New York State Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.