Legal Opinion
Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc. v. Moore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1954PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
In this article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the State Industrial Commissioner fixing prevailing rate of wages pursuant to section 220 of the Labor Law. Petitioner is a contractor who was engaged, under written contract, to build a tunnel in Broome County as part of a State project. Involved is the classification and rate of pay of men who worked in digging the tunnel. The contractor has contended that the men were used as common laborers and were so paid, in accordance with the schedule attached to the specifications. The State Industrial Commissioner has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fata v. S. A. Healy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Filardo v. Foley Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Building Chemicals Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1937
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mid Hudson Pam Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hull-Hazard, Inc. v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- F. G. Compagni Construction Co. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Ronco Communications & Electronics, Inc. v. ValentineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Brang Co. v. State University Construction FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.