Legal Opinion
Brian Hoxie's Painting Co. v. Cato-Meridian Central School District
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1990PublishedCited by 55 opinions
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
Plaintiff was required to pay its employees approximately $6,000 in additional wages and supplements for having failed to pay the prevailing wages, dictated by Labor Law § 220, while performing a work contract for defendant school district. It brought this action seeking to recover that amount from the school district on the ground that the school district, in soliciting bids for the contract, had failed to give notice of the applicable prevailing wages as required by Labor Law § 220-d. Supreme Court dismissed the complaint and the Appellate Division…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sheehy v. Big Flats Community Day, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. GoldinNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bucci v. Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- AHA Sales, Inc. v. Creative Bath Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Carrier v. Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Goldman v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hammer v. American Kennel ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.