Boomer v. Frank
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
¶ 1 The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether a licensed driver accompanying a driver with only a learner’s permit has a duty to exercise reasonable care. The trial court decided that he does not, and entered summary judgment for the licensed driver, defendant Curtis Frank. We hold that as a matter of. law, the licensed driver has a duty. See generally Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Bd., 146 Ariz. 352, 354, 706 P.2d 364, 366 (1985) (whether a duty exists is a question of law).
¶ 2 The plaintiffs are the Boomer family. They were injured when their Toyota sport…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanger v. HangerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Leibel v. Buckeye, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021