Legal Opinion

Boomer v. Frank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 25, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

¶ 1 The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether a licensed driver accompanying a driver with only a learner’s permit has a duty to exercise reasonable care. The trial court decided that he does not, and entered summary judgment for the licensed driver, defendant Curtis Frank. We hold that as a matter of. law, the licensed driver has a duty. See generally Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Bd., 146 Ariz. 352, 354, 706 P.2d 364, 366 (1985) (whether a duty exists is a question of law).

¶ 2 The plaintiffs are the Boomer family. They were injured when their Toyota sport…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanger v. HangerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  2. Leibel v. Buckeye, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API