Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 21, 1927No. 14165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Motions for probation for defendants Bilodeau, Sword, Everett, and Frank. Defendants who have filed motions for probation were indicted with Walter George Young and Max Hoffman for conspiracy to secure possession of denatured alcohol free of internal revenue *130tax, to wit, alcohol rendered unfit for beverage and liquid medicinal purposes under Act June 7, 1906 (34 Stat.' 217), with intent of recovering and attempting to recover by redistillation the alcohol so secured and to knowingly conceal and dispose of the alcohol so recovered and redistilled, in violation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Nix v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Kriebel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
  4. Evans v. District Judge of the United States for the Western District of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  5. Bilodeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. White v. SteiglederCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  4. Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API