Koeller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
Action on a certificate issued to the plaintiff by the relief department of the Chicago, Burlington .& Quincy Railway Company. It appears without dispute that the defendant maintains and conducts what is known as its “Voluntary Relief Department”; that the plaintiff, who was employed by the defendant in its railroad shops at Havelock, became a member of that department, and the certificate in question was issued to him on the 22d day of March, 1897; that he paid his dues and assessments thereon up to the date of his injury, which occurred while in defendant’s service, and at that time he was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WymoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Miller v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1894
- Oyster v. Burlington Relief DepartmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GravittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Grandillo v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
- Roberson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1922