Legal Opinion

Grandillo v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 13, 1932No. 101Published

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court: The plaintiff alleges that he was an employee of the defendant company and as such made a contract with that company whereby, based on a species of accident and disability insurance, he is entitled to receive from it certain sums of money, in the way of sick benefits, which it has refused to pay.

The amended seventh plea denies that the plaintiff’s contract was with the defendant company. It sets up matters in defense of the plaintiff’s right of action and not merely in abatement of the particular action brought, and is, therefore, a plea in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Kinney v. Balt. & Ohio Emp. Rel. Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Eckman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Nelson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. Relief DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Kelly v. Trimont Lodge, No. 249Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API