Fosbroke v. National Exchange Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Defendant, through one Joseph J. Hennen, listed a farm for sale with several agents, including plaintiff who submitted an offer of $19,000 cash from one Holcomb. On February 14, 1927, Hennen, acting for defendant, unqualifiedly accepted the offer. Plaintiff seeks to collect a commission.
In an action of this character such an offer and acceptance does not in law contemplate a written contract. It created the duty of the agent to present his purchaser with the money. He did not earn his…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Mayberry v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Kief v. HimleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Harrington v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Crawford v. Thurston-Huffman Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.