Legal Opinion

Fosbroke v. National Exchange Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1929No. 27,071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Defendant, through one Joseph J. Hennen, listed a farm for sale with several agents, including plaintiff who submitted an offer of $19,000 cash from one Holcomb. On February 14, 1927, Hennen, acting for defendant, unqualifiedly accepted the offer. Plaintiff seeks to collect a commission.

In an action of this character such an offer and acceptance does not in law contemplate a written contract. It created the duty of the agent to present his purchaser with the money. He did not earn his…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carney v. John Hancock Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Mayberry v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Kief v. HimleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Harrington v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Crawford v. Thurston-Huffman Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API