Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Thurston-Huffman Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1929No. 27,196Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant United Signs, Inc. appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s work for defendant was to solicit painting jobs. His compensation was 20 per cent. His employment commenced on March. 29, 1927. On March 7, 1927, defendant had quoted prices to the Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Association. They were unacceptable as too high.

Plaintiff learned of the association’s requirements and was informed that a competitor was about to get the work. His disputed testimony is that he did not know of defendant’s futile and apparently terminated efforts to get the work. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francis v. EddySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Fosbroke v. National Exchange BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Studer v. BysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API