Legal Opinion

H. B. Deal & Co. v. Head

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 20, 1952No. 4-9702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

The appellees, Thomas L. Head, et al., (hereinafter called “Plaintiffs”), were employed by appellant, H. B. Deal & Company (hereinafter called “Deal”), in constructing the Ozark Ordnance Plant in El Dorado; and plaintiffs filed action against Deal in the Union Circuit Court, claiming additional amounts to be due each of the plaintiffs for overtime work. While the said action was pending in the Circuit Court, Deal unsuccessfully petitioned this Court for a writ of prohibition. See Deal v. Marlin, 209 Ark. 967, 193 S. W. 2d 315. After we denied prohibition, the Circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Fata v. S. A. Healy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howell v. Worth James Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. H. B. Deal & Co. v. BoldingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Aetna Insurance Company v. Saul EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Stilwell Frozen Foods, Inc. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
  5. Aetna Insurance v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API