Legal Opinion

Howell v. Worth James Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1976No. 75-367PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

The appellant Tall Timber Development Corporation is the owner and developer of Tall Timber subdivision. In March, 1973, Tall Timber Development Corporation entered into a contract with the appellee Worth James Construction Company. Pursuant to this contract, the appellee constructed water and sewer lines for the subdivision. The appellee was fully paid the contract price of $363,672.22. In October, 1973, the appellant Tall Timber entered into a separate contract with appellant Howell (who does not favor us with a brief) under which Howell did the trenching for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulbright v. PhippsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Walker v. Wittenberg, Delony & Davidson, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Carolus v. Arkansas Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Spear Mining Co. v. ShinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Freer v. J. G. Putman Funeral, Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Perry v. Baptist HealthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Little Rock Wastewater Utility v. Larry Moyer Trucking, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Edgin v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Elsner v. Farmers Insurance Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Stilley v. JamesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API