Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wayne County v. Department of Corrections Director

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1994No. Docket 150606Published

1DissentMarilyn Kelly, J.

I respectfully dissent. I would vacate the order of the trial court and order the Department of Corrections to pay Wayne County.

*716I

At the outset, I note that I am in general agreement with the standard of review adopted by the majority. The primary objective of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the intent of the Legislature. Great Lakes Sales, Inc v State Tax Comm, 194 Mich App 271, 275; 486 NW2d 367 (1992). Where the language of a statute is clear, there is no need for interpretation; the statute must be applied as written. Farrington v Total Petroleum, Inc, 442 Mich…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Feld v. Robert & Charles Beauty SalonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Great Lakes Sales, Inc v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API