Legal Opinion

Dulin, Thienpont, Potthast & Snyder, Ltd. v. Packaging Personified, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 14, 1980No. 79-2081PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

This case originated as an attempt by plaintiff, the law firm of Dulin, Thienpont, Potthast and Snyder, to collect for professional services rendered to Packaging Personified. When defendant Packaging Personified refused to pay plaintiff’s billing of $1,162.63, plaintiff brought suit. Following a default judgment entered on behalf of plaintiff on August 25, 1979, and a damages hearing held on August 28, defendant made a motion to vacate the default on September 7, well within the 30-day period allotted by statute. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 50(5).) The trial court denied the motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerns v. EngelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Deckard v. JoinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Johnson v. La Grange State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Morton v. Environmental Land Systems, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chand v. SchlimmeIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Third Establishment, Inc. v. 1931 North Park ApartmentsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Sutton v. EdgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Bank of Waukegan v. Epilepsy Foundation of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. B-G Associates, Inc. v. GironAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API