Legal Opinion

Williams v. Iola Electric Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1918No. 21,211PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Oscar Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This case presents the- usual consequences which arise when an automobile and a trolley car arrive at the same place at the same time.

The plaintiff was driving his automobile southward on Martin street in Gas city. An interurban passenger car belonging to defendant was running eastward on its car line, which crosses Martin street at right angles'. A high embankment on the north side of the car line, with high weeds and grass growing thereon, obscured the car from plaintiff’s view, and a collision occurred at the crossing; the plaintiff was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Wehe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Bunton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. WilleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Horton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Brim v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API