Legal Opinion

Magee v. Breckenridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1952No. Civ. No. 4379Published

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover $3,560.81 for the reasonable value of services and material claimed to have been furnished to defendant. The court found that defendant B. B. Breckenridge was indebted to plaintiff individually for $2,514.81 and to him as intervener and as trustee and receiver for B. G. & S. Drilling Company, a copartnership, in the sum of $600. By stipulation, Stewart Magee, as receiver, was permitted to intervene in this action.

Defendant answered, denied generally the allegations of the complaint, and alleged, as a separate defense, that defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API