Magee v. Breckenridge
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover $3,560.81 for the reasonable value of services and material claimed to have been furnished to defendant. The court found that defendant B. B. Breckenridge was indebted to plaintiff individually for $2,514.81 and to him as intervener and as trustee and receiver for B. G. & S. Drilling Company, a copartnership, in the sum of $600. By stipulation, Stewart Magee, as receiver, was permitted to intervene in this action.
Defendant answered, denied generally the allegations of the complaint, and alleged, as a separate defense, that defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Willett & Burr v. AlpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.