Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bell v. Bd. of County Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1941No. File No. 8445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

A writ of certiorari was directed to the County Commissioners of Beadle County, South Dakota, by the Circuit Court asking that their action in adopting a certain resolution be reviewed. The resolution reads as follows:

“Whereas, at the Fall Election Beadle County is to vote with other counties in the State on the Question of South Dakota State School Fund Amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, and
“Whereas, the failure of passage of such constitutional amendment would mean a tremendous increase in the indebtedness of Beadle County, now in excess of $500,000 and an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Mosier v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. South Dakota Employers Protective Ass'n v. PoageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Pommarane v. Washabaugh CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pucket v. Hot Springs School District No. 23-2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Jacobsen v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the Wrongful Payments of Attorney Fees Made by the Brookings School District School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Daniel Pucket v. Hot Springs School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the Wrongful Payments of Attorney Fees Made by the Brookings School District School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API