Legal Opinion

South Dakota Employers Protective Ass'n v. Poage

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1937No. Files Nos. 7963 and 7968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSm'Ith, J.

This special proceeding was commenced by filing a petition praying for a writ of mandamus. An alternative writ was issued, to which the defendant interposed a demurrer and made a motion to quash. The demurrer and the motion were based on the common ground that the affidavit or petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. ■ The court entered an order sustaining the demurrer, andi a further order quashing the writ. The plaintiff perfected a separate appeal to this court as to each order, and by stipulation of counsel the two appeals were consolidated and considered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. SkinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Meek v. Meade CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Evans v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pearson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jerauld County v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State v. Perkins CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Umpleby Ex Rel. Umpleby v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota State Game & Fish DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Scissons v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API