Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Department of Taxation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The Delaware corporation was a subsidiary of the Illinois corporation and on September 24, 1943, was merged into the appellant corporation which became liable as transferee for the income taxes of its subsidiary and stands in the position of the taxpayer so that no distinction will hereafter. be made between the two corporations. They will be referred to as the “taxpayer.”

At the time the tax was levied the taxpayer, was a foreign corporation doing business in Wisconsin as well as in many of the other states. The tax was figured by the Wisconsin authorities on a formula basis of apportionment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Stewart Dry Goods Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Newport Co. v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ed. Schuster & Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Department of Taxation v. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API