Legal Opinion

Labbe v. Pension Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 28, 1994No. 14696PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff Alan Labbe1 was excused from exhausting the grievance procedures under a collective bargaining agreement before commencing an action in the Superior Court because using the procedures would have been futile. The plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he had failed to exhaust his contractual remedies. The defendants, the Hartford pension commission and the city of Hartford, cross appealed. We transferred the case to this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Simko v. ErvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API