Smith v. CONSOLIDATED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
Plaintiff, an employee of the Sinclair Refining Company, brought this suit to recover further benefits from defendant, the compensation carrier for the Sinclair Refining Company. In the course of his employment, plaintiff stuck a nail in his foot on September 24, 1953. He was promptly given a tetanus shot at his employer’s first aid station. A week later he developed a severe reaction. Plaintiff alleged that this reaction resulted in a partial permanent disability, and sought to recover compensation benefits therefor. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, in response to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- Hargrove v. Trinity Universal InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- American General Insurance Company v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Company v. J. R. TruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Consolidated Casualty Insurance Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Muro v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Argonaut Insurance Company v. ShawverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.