Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. Trinity Universal Insurance

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1953No. A-3798PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

Based upon pleadings adequate in all respects to present both theories of recovery alternatively, a jury found that petitioner, proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, had sustained general injuries resulting in temporary total incapacity for a period of 44 weeks and permanent partial incapacity of 50%, and that he had sustained specific injuries to both of his legs through permanent partial loss, to the extent of 50% thereof, of the use of his legs at or above the knees. No doubt to the surprise of all parties concerned the findings with respect to the specific injuries operated to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendrick Memorial HospitalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendricks Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Boyce Iron Works, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Navarette v. Temple Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Yeldell v. Holiday Hills Retirement and Nursing Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Flores v. Employees Retirement System of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API