Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1982No. A7811-8908, CA 18130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this proceeding under the Implied Consent Law,1 the Motor Vehicles Division seeks to suspend petitioner’s operator’s license for 120 days because of his refusal to submit to a chemical breath test following his arrest for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. After a hearing before MVD, petitioner appealed the agency’s suspension order to the circuit court for a trial de novo pursuant to ORS 482.560.2 He now seeks reversal of the circuit court’s order dismissing his petition. We reverse.

Petitioner raises three questions on appeal, only one of which needs to be addressed:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cavagnaro v. Motor Vehicles Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Lundquist v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIV., DEPT., TRANSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bunten v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, ETC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State v. BattenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API