Legal Opinion
State v. Haynes
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1979No. TC 78-1762, CA 11461, SC 26285PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*61LINDE, J.
The issue to be decided is whether the prosecution may use against a defendant statements obtained from him while in police custody and after the police, but not the defendant, knew that an attorney sought to consult with him. The question came before the Court of Appeals simultaneously in two cases, in one of which the statement had been admitted and in the other of which it had been excluded by the respective trial courts. The Court of Appeals was evenly divided on the issue, thus affirming both trial courts in this respect. State v. Henry, State v. Haynes, 40 Or App 129, 594 P2d…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. McCauleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.