Legal Opinion

National Aniline & Chemical Co. v. Arnhold

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 12, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

I am in much doubt whether the pleas in this case, as distinct from the counterclaims, should as of right be tried to a jury or in equity. The difficulty is that the decisions of the Supreme Court leave it questionable whether fraud is not a good legal plea to an action at law on a written instrument, even a specialty, as is the contract in suit. Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 20 L. Ed. 501, was the case of an insurance policy, where the defendant had as a defense that the assured had made false statements to get the policy. A bill in equity was dismissed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Cable v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
  2. Pringle v. StorrowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
  3. Hoad v. New York Cent. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  4. Dunn v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API