Pringle v. Storrow
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
This is an action to recover for the broach of a duty owed to the plaintiff in regard to the purchase of property for investment. The defendants filed a general denial; they also pleaded a release under seal. The question raised by this motion is one of much importance in the trial of eases by jury. The answer to it depends on the examination of many authorities — their name is legion — in the federal courts. The question is whether, in a trial by a jury, a sealed instrument can be shown to have been procured by fraud. To one accustomed to the practice in the state…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Cable v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Patterson v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932
- Hollingsworth v. GENERAL PETROLEUM CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1939
- Hoad v. New York Cent. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1933
- Dunn v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.