Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

On February 15,1899, plaintiff and defendant intermarried. At the time of their marriage, neither possessed any property except some personal effects of small value. They lived and worked together on a farm until 1920. At that time, plaintiff concluded that she could make more money working in a store and moved to McMinnville where she secured employment in a grocery store. The defendant con- tinned to work the farm, and occasionally rent it. He finally moved to McMinnville and became an employee of other persons. .

About the year 1929, some difficulty arose between the parties and on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Halstead v. HalsteadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  2. Hill v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Weingart v. KiessenbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Jensen v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API