Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRo'Ssman, J.

This suit, instituted by the husband, seeks a divorce on a charge of desertion; the answer denies this charge, and by way of cross-bill seeks a divorce on charges of cruel and inhuman treatment. The complaint alleges that the property rights of the parties were previously settled; this the answer denies and alleges that the plaintiff owns real property of the value of $50,000, and that at the time of the alleged property settlement the defendant was mentally unfit to negotiate a settlement; it avers that the settlement was inequitable and unfair. The trial court denied relief to both parties.

T…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Halstead v. HalsteadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Buttlar v. ButtlarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hollingworth v. HollingworthOregon Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API