Hill v. Hill
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRo'Ssman, J.
This suit, instituted by the husband, seeks a divorce on a charge of desertion; the answer denies this charge, and by way of cross-bill seeks a divorce on charges of cruel and inhuman treatment. The complaint alleges that the property rights of the parties were previously settled; this the answer denies and alleges that the plaintiff owns real property of the value of $50,000, and that at the time of the alleged property settlement the defendant was mentally unfit to negotiate a settlement; it avers that the settlement was inequitable and unfair. The trial court denied relief to both parties.
T…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Halstead v. HalsteadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Montgomery v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Buttlar v. ButtlarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Hollingworth v. HollingworthOregon Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.