Legal Opinion

Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co. v. Neely

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1934No. 23989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. Where certain farm-equipment machinery is sold under an express warranty as to quality, and by the terms of the contract of sale it is provided that on breach of such warranty the liability of the seller to the purchasers is predicated upon the performance of certain conditions precedent by the purchasers, such as that “the buyer shall not be entitled to rely upon any breach of the above warranty or to rescind this contract, unless within five days from the first use thereof, for any purpose, the buyer shall immediately have given written notice by regis-. *232tered mail” to the seller,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Malsby & Avery v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. City of Moultrie v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Fay & Eagan Co. v. Dudley & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belle City Manufacturing Co. v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Frick Company Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Neely v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Christie v. Thomasville Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API