Belle City Manufacturing Co. v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “Where in the sale of machinery there is an express warranty as to quality, and, by the terms of the contract, liability of the seller for the breach of such warranty is predicated upon conditions. which must, as a condition precedent, be performed by the buyer, the seller will not be held liable on the warranty thus limited, unless the buyer complies with the conditions set forth therein” (Frick Co. v. Bridges, 51 Ga. App. 123, 127, 128, 179 S. E. 861; International Harvester Co. v. Morgan, 19 Ga. App. 716, 719, 92 S. E. 35, and cit.), unless the seller waives such compliance by the buyer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- International Harvester Co. of America v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Shanks v. CowartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Frick Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frick Company Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Wade v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Williams v. AbercrombieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939