Equipment Advertiser, Inc. v. Harris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, C.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for amended findings or for a new trial. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, asserting that defendants had conspired to injure its business, had copied a certain circulation list, and had used a deceptively similar name and format for their competing publication after leaving plaintiff’s employ.
On April 19, 1963, the Hennepin County District Court issued a temporary injunction restraining defendants from using a deceptively similar name to that of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Boone v. KriegSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Modern Controls, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Nicholas C. Andreadakis, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Neilan v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.