Legal Opinion

Equipment Advertiser, Inc. v. Harris

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1965No. 39703PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for amended findings or for a new trial. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, asserting that defendants had conspired to injure its business, had copied a certain circulation list, and had used a deceptively similar name and format for their competing publication after leaving plaintiff’s employ.

On April 19, 1963, the Hennepin County District Court issued a temporary injunction restraining defendants from using a deceptively similar name to that of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Ehmke v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Boone v. KriegSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  4. Modern Controls, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Nicholas C. Andreadakis, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Neilan v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API