Boone v. Krieg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to restrain defendant from soliciting plaintiff’s customers or from using lists of their names. From an order, Molyneaux, J., denying her motion for a temporary injunction, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a temporary injunction.
The plaintiff for many years has been engaged in the business of multigraphing letters and advertising material, addressing letters and other similar work in Minneapolis, and has built up a lucrative business. For eight years the defendant, now -a young man of 23, was employed by the plaintiff on a week to week con*84tract. He was a faithful employe, valuable to the business, and became acquainted with the customers of the plaintiff with whom he came into personal contact in the conduct of the business and his'…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Peerless Pattern Co. v. Pictorial Review Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Stein v. National Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Grand Union Tea Co. v. DoddsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Elaterite Paint & Manufacturing Co. v. S. E. Frost Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Texas Shop Towel, Inc. v. HaireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Blackburn, Nickels & Smith, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- JAMES A. HEAD & COMPANY v. RollingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Progress Laundry Company v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.