Legal Opinion

Allied Leather Corp. v. Altama Delta Corp.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1992No. Civ. A. 1:CV-91-1305PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAMBO, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion to dismiss of defendant Altama Delta Corporation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), based on lack of personal jurisdiction. Discovery on the jurisdictional issue has taken place, the motion has been fully briefed, 1 and is therefore ripe for consideration.

Background 2

Defendant Altama Leather Corporation is a large manufacturer of shoes and boots for the military incorporated and headquartered in Georgia. Plaintiff Allied Leather Corporation is a producer and distributor of leather incorporated under the laws of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Reliance Steel Products Company v. Watson, Ess, Marshall & EnggasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. AM. OVERSEAS MARINE v. PattersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Clark v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Modern Mailers, Inc. v. Johnson & Quin, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom EquipmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API