Legal Opinion
Clark v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 1993No. Civ. A. 1:CV-92-0561PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, Chief Judge.
Before the court is the motion of defendant Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd. (“MEI”) to dismiss it as a party in this case due to an alleged lack of personal jurisdiction. Also before the court is MEI’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s July 31, 1992 order. That order denied MEI’s motion to dismiss for insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of process. Discovery has taken place on the personal jurisdiction issue and briefs have been filed on all motions. Therefore, the motions are ripe for disposition.
Background
The captioned…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Jiffy Lube International, Inc. v. Jiffy Lube of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Arch v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Heft v. AAI CORP.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.