Legal Opinion

Orenstein v. New Jersey Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 4, 1925No. 11673PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran.

At the call of this case in the Supreme Court the attorneys for the appellant made a motion that they be allowed to amend their exceptions by pointing out more definitely the errors of which complaint was made. After due consideration this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be, and the same is hereby, granted.

This suit by the plaintiff is to recover $2,232.47 and intrest alleged to be due it by the defendant upon the following complaint:(1) That plaintiff, J. Orenstein, is a resident of Rich-land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Orient InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Chandos v. American Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Ruberg v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Lewis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Citizens State Bank v. State Mutual Rodded Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mulkey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Orenstein v. Star Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HuntSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API